feat: init

This commit is contained in:
2025-01-30 20:02:28 +08:00
parent da0d9855da
commit 1785df25e2
125 changed files with 8601 additions and 4725 deletions

View File

@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
import { TestBed } from '@angular/core/testing';
import { mockProvider } from '../../../test/auto-mock';
import { TestBed, mockImplementationWhenArgsEqual } from '@/testing';
import { vi } from 'vitest';
import { LogLevel } from '../../logging/log-level';
import { LoggerService } from '../../logging/logger.service';
import { OpenIdConfiguration } from '../openid-configuration';
import { mockProvider } from '../../testing/mock';
import type { OpenIdConfiguration } from '../openid-configuration';
import { ConfigValidationService } from './config-validation.service';
import { allMultipleConfigRules } from './rules';
@@ -14,6 +15,8 @@ describe('Config Validation Service', () => {
TestBed.configureTestingModule({
providers: [ConfigValidationService, mockProvider(LoggerService)],
});
configValidationService = TestBed.inject(ConfigValidationService);
loggerService = TestBed.inject(LoggerService);
});
const VALID_CONFIG = {
@@ -29,11 +32,6 @@ describe('Config Validation Service', () => {
logLevel: LogLevel.Debug,
};
beforeEach(() => {
configValidationService = TestBed.inject(ConfigValidationService);
loggerService = TestBed.inject(LoggerService);
});
it('should create', () => {
expect(configValidationService).toBeTruthy();
});
@@ -42,26 +40,27 @@ describe('Config Validation Service', () => {
const config = {};
const result = configValidationService.validateConfig(config);
expect(result).toBeFalse();
expect(result).toBeFalsy();
});
it('should return true for valid config', () => {
const result = configValidationService.validateConfig(VALID_CONFIG);
expect(result).toBeTrue();
expect(result).toBeTruthy();
});
it('calls `logWarning` if one rule has warning level', () => {
const loggerWarningSpy = spyOn(loggerService, 'logWarning');
const messageTypeSpy = spyOn(
const loggerWarningSpy = vi.spyOn(loggerService, 'logWarning');
const messageTypeSpy = vi.spyOn(
configValidationService as any,
'getAllMessagesOfType'
);
messageTypeSpy
.withArgs('warning', jasmine.any(Array))
.and.returnValue(['A warning message']);
messageTypeSpy.withArgs('error', jasmine.any(Array)).and.callThrough();
mockImplementationWhenArgsEqual(
messageTypeSpy,
(arg1: any, arg2: any) => arg1 === 'warning' && Array.isArray(arg2),
() => ['A warning message']
);
configValidationService.validateConfig(VALID_CONFIG);
expect(loggerWarningSpy).toHaveBeenCalled();
@@ -72,7 +71,7 @@ describe('Config Validation Service', () => {
const config = { ...VALID_CONFIG, clientId: '' } as OpenIdConfiguration;
const result = configValidationService.validateConfig(config);
expect(result).toBeFalse();
expect(result).toBeFalsy();
});
});
@@ -84,7 +83,7 @@ describe('Config Validation Service', () => {
} as OpenIdConfiguration;
const result = configValidationService.validateConfig(config);
expect(result).toBeFalse();
expect(result).toBeFalsy();
});
});
@@ -93,7 +92,7 @@ describe('Config Validation Service', () => {
const config = { ...VALID_CONFIG, redirectUrl: '' };
const result = configValidationService.validateConfig(config);
expect(result).toBeFalse();
expect(result).toBeFalsy();
});
});
@@ -107,7 +106,7 @@ describe('Config Validation Service', () => {
} as OpenIdConfiguration;
const result = configValidationService.validateConfig(config);
expect(result).toBeFalse();
expect(result).toBeFalsy();
});
});
@@ -120,12 +119,12 @@ describe('Config Validation Service', () => {
scopes: 'scope1 scope2 but_no_offline_access',
};
const loggerSpy = spyOn(loggerService, 'logError');
const loggerWarningSpy = spyOn(loggerService, 'logWarning');
const loggerSpy = vi.spyOn(loggerService, 'logError');
const loggerWarningSpy = vi.spyOn(loggerService, 'logWarning');
const result = configValidationService.validateConfig(config);
expect(result).toBeTrue();
expect(result).toBeTruthy();
expect(loggerSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(loggerWarningSpy).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
@@ -146,47 +145,47 @@ describe('Config Validation Service', () => {
scopes: 'scope1 scope2 but_no_offline_access',
};
const loggerErrorSpy = spyOn(loggerService, 'logError');
const loggerWarningSpy = spyOn(loggerService, 'logWarning');
const loggerErrorSpy = vi.spyOn(loggerService, 'logError');
const loggerWarningSpy = vi.spyOn(loggerService, 'logWarning');
const result = configValidationService.validateConfigs([
config1,
config2,
]);
expect(result).toBeTrue();
expect(result).toBeTruthy();
expect(loggerErrorSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(loggerWarningSpy.calls.argsFor(0)).toEqual([
expect(vi.mocked(loggerWarningSpy).mock.calls[0]).toEqual([
config1,
'You added multiple configs with the same authority, clientId and scope',
]);
expect(loggerWarningSpy.calls.argsFor(1)).toEqual([
expect(vi.mocked(loggerWarningSpy).mock.calls[1]).toEqual([
config2,
'You added multiple configs with the same authority, clientId and scope',
]);
});
it('should return false and a better error message when config is not passed as object with config property', () => {
const loggerWarningSpy = spyOn(loggerService, 'logWarning');
const loggerWarningSpy = vi.spyOn(loggerService, 'logWarning');
const result = configValidationService.validateConfigs([]);
expect(result).toBeFalse();
expect(result).toBeFalsy();
expect(loggerWarningSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});
describe('validateConfigs', () => {
it('calls internal method with empty array if something falsy is passed', () => {
const spy = spyOn(
const spy = vi.spyOn(
configValidationService as any,
'validateConfigsInternal'
).and.callThrough();
);
const result = configValidationService.validateConfigs([]);
expect(result).toBeFalse();
expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalledOnceWith([], allMultipleConfigRules);
expect(result).toBeFalsy();
expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith([], allMultipleConfigRules);
});
});
});